Loading...
The Geoeconomic Shockwave of the Iran-USA-Israel Conflict
Security & Defense 28 May 2026

The Geoeconomic Shockwave of the Iran-USA-Israel Conflict

S

Salim Rabbani

IIEG Expert

The multidimensional dispute between Iran and the Washington-Tel Aviv axis, transmuted into a kinetic confrontation since February 2026, does not constitute a simple regional crisis, but a catalyst for fragmentation of the world system. The intensity of this crisis corroborates the theses of strategic stagnation, where Israel's preventive posture and the American doctrine of containment aim, through forced decoupling, to neutralize Eurasian influence in the Middle East. The geoeconomic repercussions are structured around four pillars: energy security, global logistics, industrial resilience and macrofinancial balances.

Energy Crisis and Flow Disruption

The partial asphyxiation of the Strait of Hormuz – a strategic lock through which 30% of the world's oil and 17% of the world's gas transit – has generated major exogenous volatility, propelling prices beyond 50% of their pre-conflict value.
  • The profitability differential: The selective blockage (reduction to 5 million barrels/day) highlights a critical asymmetry: while extraction costs in the Middle East remain marginal ($3-10), American shale hydrocarbons require a much higher profitability threshold ($40-60), accentuating global energy inflation.
  • Alternatives and reorientation: If the increase in flow rates via the Abqaiq-Yanbu pipeline (targeting 7 million b/d according to Saudi Aramco) and the Habshan-Fujairah pipeline offers a palliative, the shutdown of the northern routes (Kurdistan, BTC) limits the compensation. In the medium term, we are witnessing a pivot towards the West: the development of Mediterranean infrastructure secured by American-Israeli influence foreshadows a diversion of resources to the detriment of Asian economies (China, India, Japan).

Reconfiguration of Logistics and Trade

Insecurity in chokepoints (Bab el-Mandeb, Suez) requires a redefinition of maritime geography. The diversion via the Cape of Good Hope, while it guarantees the continuity of flows for the Atlantic powers, induces a structural increase in costs (20-30%) and an extension of delivery times.
  • The decline of East-West routes: The model of horizontal flows, pillar of liberal globalization, is obsolete. The architecture of the “New Silk Roads” is compromised, apart from its Russian and Central Asian continental segments, themselves burdened by diplomatic ostracism towards Moscow.
  • The emergence of the North-South model: We are observing a transition towards a regionalized model based on nearshoring and friendshoring. This shift favors a reindustrialization of the West and propels Africa and Latin America as new productive lungs, articulated around the energy-water-material nexus.

Disruptions and Industrial Sovereignty

The conflict reveals the dependence of processing industries on Middle Eastern inputs (chemistry, metals, helium).
  • The food peril: The tension over fertilizers is symptomatic. Despite the capabilities of leaders like OCP in Morocco, dependence on regional inputs (ammonia) creates a risk of supply disruption. The security strategies of India and the USA illustrate a return to strategic protectionism.
  • Defense economy: The arms sector is emerging as the main beneficiary of this instability, with an acceleration in global military budgets (exceeding $1,781 billion by 2024).
  • War of commodities: China's use of its levers on sensitive technologies (rare earths, PCBs) in response to Western pressure confirms the transition from a market economy to an shortage management economy.

Macroeconomic Imbalances and Systemic Risk

The conflict serves as a vector for a struggle for monetary supremacy. Anchoring the dollar to “strategic nexus” trade is a direct response to the desire for dedollarization of the BRICS.
  • Recessionary spiral: Imported inflation forces central banks to tighten monetary policy. The rise in interest rates and the widening of bond spreads (notably between the Bund and the OAT) revive the specter of a fragmentation of the euro zone.
  • Atrophy of growth: The correlation between the rise in oil prices and the fall in GDP (0.5 points of growth lost for 10% increase in price) suggests a lasting global recession, an increase in structural unemployment and an unsustainable deterioration in debt service for the most exposed States.
The current confrontation seals the end of the illusion of infinite and deregulated growth. The world is falling into an era of systemic fragmentation where the Middle East remains the pivot of the balance of power between East and West. The viability of the international financial system, still indexed to the petrodollar, is now being tested by a geopolitical reality where supply radically takes precedence over demand. References Clausewitz, C. von: Of War – For the analysis of the continuity of politics through financial means. Mackinder, H.: The Geographic Pivot of History – Relevance of the Middle East/Eurasia zone. Friendshoring Theory (J. Yellen): Analysis of new resilient zones of influence. Reports from the IEA and the World Bank (2025-2026): Data on transport capacities and growth forecasts. Energy-Water-Food Nexus Concept: Sustainable global security analysis framework.  ‎